Context Dependence

choices
framing

Context dependence describes how the same option can be more or less attractive depending on what else is in the choice set. It can further be distinguished into:

Compromise Effect

The middle option in a set is preferred because it avoids the feeling of choosing an “extreme.”

NoteExample

Coffee menu sizes

Adding a “Large” option (€7.00) to a café menu that previously had only Small (€3.00) and Medium (€4.50) makes the Medium feel like the sensible middle ground and increases its sales.

Starbucks coffee sizes and prices: It seems reasonable to go for the Tall option, since it’s near the middle, right?

Attraction Effect

Adding a “dummy” option that no one would pick, to make another option more attractive.

NoteExample

Subscription offers

A newspaper offers: (a) Web-only €59, (b) Print-only €125, (c) Web + Print €125. No one would choose Print-only over Web + Print at the same price; it’s a decoy that makes option (c) look like a better deal.

Similarity Effect

Adding a similar option to a competitor’s offering splits the share (e.g. votes or market share) they would receive.

NoteExample

Election candidates

A second progressive candidate entering a municipal election will lead to a split of the progressive votes between them, increasing thus the chances of their opponents.